This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This redirect is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Agree with proposal. No objections so merge done. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems to be a slight amplification of part of Franco-Siamese War. Unfortunately, apart from primary accounts written by a British commentator Norman in 1895, who relied on French press accounts, and a French commentator de Pouvourville slightly later (who had detailed information on telegraphic messages), very little has been written about Grosgurin outside the incident surrounding his death, which was significant. The article suffers because it has to reestablish the background of the parent article in order to make any sense. At present it does this only partially. The details present here (e.g. the court case) would be valuable in the main article, so there seems to be no purpose at all in a spin-off article, nor any precedent on the basis of existing historical encyclopedias. Mathsci (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
