Talk:Askeladd

Askeladd has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 20, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

GA Review[edit]

Passed. Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Askeladd/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 20:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation[edit]

This sentence feels a bit odd: "While strange, he felt like it was a product of chance."

- Done

The second paragraph feels like it needs some tweaking, as it's introducing things to the reader while assuming the reader is already aware of them (interactions with other characters we haven't heard about, his character traits etc).

- Revised. I forgot to introduce Prince Canute.

Reception[edit]

I believe the paper title should be italicized, but also make note it is a paper so people understand what's being referenced.

- Added italics for every publication.

That's...actually all the issues I have. Overall this is a pretty solid read and a surprisingly interesting character.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC) @Kung Fu Man: Thanks for the review-Tintor2 (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, checked sources 34, 36 and 37 among others for accurate statements, passing.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 21:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.