Talk:Ashley Feinberg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... the attempt to delete it is probably an act of hate against Feinberg for her views and opinion. --203.217.91.182 (talk) 04:28, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This accusation doesn't warrant much of a response, but sure, I'll bite. I do not hate Feinberg for any reason, and I am not familiar with her work. Feinberg does seem to have a sizable Twitter following (164,000 followers as of now) and is a prolific writer for Huffpost. These two things about her do not earn her a Wikipedia page. In fact, the page is so anemic that I see little reason for its existence. Feinberg doesn't seem notable in any way. She may be a well-liked journalist or modestly Twitter famous, but if everyone with those qualifications got their own Wikipedia page, we would all have a lot of work to do. KidAd (talk) 23:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because she has been written about in multiple notable publications. The lorax (talk) 09:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Employer[edit]

The infobox and the lede offer Slate (magazine) matched by at least one reference in the body, but the body actually says Huffpost, is that as it should be? I also don't quite get if Slate (magazine) is independent of The Washington Post, the Slate article mumbles something about a WaPo "publisher". –84.46.53.107 (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the body of the article to include she joined Slate in May 2019.The lorax (talk) 04:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
^.^b Thanks. –84.46.53.99 (talk) 04:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]