Talk:Ashes to Ashes (Star Trek: Voyager)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:ST-VOY 6 18.jpg[edit]

Image:ST-VOY 6 18.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image? What image? Obviously it was removed sometime between then and now.
I wish we could use an image of Rhodes' remarkable Emmy-nominated character. Is there any rational reason why WP readers interested in the episode should not be allowed to see the artists' incredible work? It's just another inflexible, shortsighted corporation determined to enforce cultural poverty for those who don't happen to be coughing up dough.🙄 – AndyFielding (talk) 13:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not her?[edit]

I thought the episode established this wasn't Ballard at all, just an entity that thought like her because of some sort of error in the birthing process. Lots42 (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • If memory serves me correctly, the episode establishes that she is in fact Ballard, but the rebirthing/reanimation process into a different species had effectively made her into something else entirely and she did not want to return to her old life. Aoba47 (talk) 03:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]