Talk:Asajj Ventress

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Supreme Leader (Star Wars)" redirect[edit]

Why is "Supreme Leader (Star Wars)" being redirected to this page? Are there any references that connect Asajj as a supreme leader, or connect her to The Supreme Leader? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dobblestein (talkcontribs) 23:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ky Narec[edit]

Exactly how close was Asajj to her first master? She laments his death and focuses her entire life to avenging him and breaks down when Obi Wan takes his lightsaber (claiming he took "everything" when it happened). Are Jedi normally this close with their relationships? She acts like an "insane lover" or something...


Geonosian fanblade starfighter[edit]

Didn't Ventress fly the Geonosian fanblade starfighter?

http://www.starwars.com/databank/starship/fanbladestarfighter/

yes she most certainly did Ariakas 20:22, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Events of Ventress[edit]

Hello there, i have added all the major events which Ventress appeared. And attached them with the source. Please feel free to add more sections into the article. Darth Kevinmhk 06:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry to point out this but, Ventress didn't try to retake Crystophis, Episode 15 is set before the movie it's to explain why they only had the heavy cannons. I thought it might be blatently obvious with the fact that the General at the end of the Episode is supposed to be in Republic custody by then. 62.3.238.10 (talk) 10:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

anakin and ventress[edit]

i think anakin battled ventress on yavin then she fell and died and he got scarred when he was fighting in clone battlew71.2.38.191 12:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • That was her original Fate. But the new series cancels out the original series's info. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.3.238.10 (talk) 10:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I was just about to sign, I removed a part to put somewhere else and didn't add it again. 62.3.238.10 (talk) 10:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • She really shouldn't be in the newest TV series... the series would cancle out the the events and situations of the comic book "Obsession"! Kinda annoys me, considering in bought the comic in order to see her fate!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.143.236 (talk) 21:58, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • Anakin would nail her, an she will screaming like Jenna Jameson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.3.78.190 (talk) 13:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Under 'Clone Wars series' in Appearances, there is an image of Ventress as she appears in the comics, not as she appears in the series. I'm going to swap this image with the image in the profile, which is from the Clone Wars series, as I think it would be more appropriate. The other picture would probably be better in the comics section - is there a more generic image of Ventress that could be used for the profile image? Steve1138 12:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC) EDIT I've added an image more representative of her usual appearance (i.e. red lightsabres instead of blue) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve1138 (talkcontribs) 12:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i really dont like the comic picture there. She WAS introduced in the Clone Wars series, i think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.224.26.233 (talk) 03:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:02389.jpg[edit]

Image:02389.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Asajj 3d.jpg[edit]

Image:Asajj 3d.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ventress.PNG[edit]

Image:Ventress.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asajj Ventress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]