Talk:Arto Lindsay

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Jazz Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

hey[edit]

does anybody want to start throwing some sources into this thing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.249.190 (talk) 10:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arto Lindsay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160131194534/http://nyds-discographies.com/lindsay.htm to http://nyds-discographies.com/lindsay.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing table[edit]

I'm not a fan of these tables for discographies. They are not an improvement. For one thing, they are difficult to edit, especially for living musicians whose discography will continue to grow. This particular table is confusing because it combines leader albums and albums with others ("Leading artist or band"). It's an eyesore, confusing to read. Information is presented flatly rather than hierarchically. A mess. I'm grateful that anyone works on the jazz project, but there's so much else contributors could do rather than tamper with an existing discography that had no problems with it. Try to find articles where actual work needs to be done rather than doing what I consider useless prettifying that is counterproductive. One more thing: Let's please get past the assumption that more information is always better. Example: We usually exclude compilations. I spend a lot of time deleting useless information.Vmavanti (talk) 01:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]