Talk:Arthur Dolphin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

How is this written from a 'fans' point of view? If Herbert Sutcliffe thought Dolphin a fine keeper then that should be reflected in the article. Removing every nice phrase makes articles unreadable rather than neutral. 124.184.225.185 16:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Nick Mallory.[reply]

Because this is an encyclopedia, not a memorial / fansite / jolly good read. The bare facts, neutrally presented and researched, such as Sutcliffe's comments, make this place what is is. Please read Wikipedia:What it is not.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]