Talk:Arsia Mons

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Earth coordinates?![edit]

Guys, what's the point of having links to earth maps from those sets of martian latitudes and longitudes? --89.181.56.43 17:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently the external site where the coordinates are linked doesn't yet recognize the "globe:Mars" tag.— JyriL talk 19:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Numerical mess[edit]

According to PIA03799 the volcano rises more than 20 kilometre above the surrounding plains; the wikipedia article states 9 kilometre (as well as PIA02337; PIA04294 gives 10 km) and the infobox gives 16 km (elevation above Martian datum?). PIA03948 gives a height of 19.31 kilometre (converted from 12 miles; does not state what the height is measured against, another datum value?). --Harald Khan Ճ 11:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now that the values are assembled, it suddenly became much easier to compare them...I guess that the PIA03799-source meant datum, while the other soures are referring to the elevation above the surrounding plains; but I don't know. --Harald Khan Ճ 11:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's still a mess. Some statistics are listed with imperial measures first, others with metric, and they still seem inconsistent. Also, it's the second biggest volcano in volume - in the universe? The solar system? On Mars? What's it being compared to? Jakaloke (talk) 19:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Arsia Mons? Someone please tell me it means "arse mountain" 118.210.141.215 (talk) 14:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arsia Mons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arsia Mons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Height[edit]

I think that the height is incorrect. In each site there are different heights and I don't know what is but probably the height put here is bad. Change it 🥺 Quadequique (talk) 15:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]