Talk:Armstrong Township, Lycoming County, Pennsylvania

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Pennsylvania B‑class Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

1890 census[edit]

Does anybody have access to the 1890 census? I don't see how over 7,000 people could've lived here in 1890. Today, Loyalsock Township has population over 10,000. Perhaps a population of over 1,000 fits Armstrong better? I've looked for more accurate info with little success. I think that 7k is an error from the scanning of the Meginnes book. Dincher 00:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another thought is that the census included, South Williamsport and Duboistown in the census figures for Armstrong. Dincher (talk) 01:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Williamsport was incorporated in 1886 and DuBoistown in 1878 combined they have a population around 8,000 today. In 1890 far less land was developed within the boroughs. I doubt they could have had 7,000 even counting the rest of Armstrong Township in 1890. Armstrong Township had more farms in 1890 and perhaps it included more of what is now DuBoistown and South Williamsport, but I don't think it could have had more than 1000 people. It has less than that today and more developed areas (though not much). A common way, though not common in the US now, to make handwritten "1" is to write what you and I'd describe as a tent and we'd easily interpret as a "7". Misinterpretted handwriting could be the source of the discrepancy. Amd194 (talk) 14:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked up Armstrong Township in the 1890 census at http://www2.census.gov/prod2/decennial/documents/1890b3_p1-08.pdf on the 50th page. 385 people lived in Armstrong Township in 1890. 1431 lived there in 1880, South Williamsport was removed from the township in the interim.

Amd194 (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking the info up. I have removed mention of the decline in population. It's not a big deal dropping from 1,000 to 700, it was a big deal with the drop from 7,000 to 700! Dincher (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. It seems to be an "adding 1 in front of the number error" then reading that 1 as a 7 as the Meginness online version here says "Armstrong township is the eighteenth in size in the county and contains 13,440 acres, with a population of 7,385 by the census of 1890." I think it was an optical character recognition / scanning error. The same online version of Meginness also will sometimes have "crook" for "creek" or "bum" for "burn", other common OCR errors. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 00:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS I Plan to double check a print version of Meginness in a few days. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I double checked the original 1890 Meginness and a modern reprint and they both gave it as "7,385". Good catch. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 22:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armstrong Township, Lycoming County, Pennsylvania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]