Talk:Argo Tunnel

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Stub‑class Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Argo Mill and Tunnel[edit]

The Argo Mill and Tunnel are both listed together as a National Historic District [1]. It may be best to incorporate parts about the mill from Argo Gold Mine and Mill into this article and remove the nrhp infobox from the Argo Gold Mine and Mill article, since that article appears to focus on the mine and it's use as a tourist attraction. Or this article could be merged into the Argo Gold Mine and Mill as a section on the mill and tunnel as a nrhp. Cacw (talk) 05:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Although within the same National Historic District, these are separate structures, and best dealt with in separate articles. Plazak (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The tunnel is separate, however, the mill is not. The mill is included on Argo Gold Mine and Mill with the mine, which is not on the national register. The national register infobox on that page gives the false impression that the mine is on the national register. The mill should either be included on this page or given its own article. Cacw (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

`Oppose enough to keep them separate dm (talk) 02:18, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Argo Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080829193450/http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/co/ccclearcreek/ to http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/co/ccclearcreek/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]