Talk:Areostationary orbit

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Mars / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mars task force.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Areostationary orbit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304001744/http://www.cwc.oulu.fi/~carlos/WSNPapers/LA01.pdf to http://www.cwc.oulu.fi/~carlos/WSNPapers/LA01.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stationkeeping - Phobos and Demios[edit]

This is with reference to the "Stationkeeping Section"

Any satellites in areostationary orbit will likely suffer from increased orbital station keeping costs, because the Clarke belt of Mars lies between the orbits of the planet's two natural satellites. Phobos has a semi-major axis of 9,376 km, and Deimos has a semi-major axis of 23,463 km. The close proximity to Phobos in particular (the larger of the two moons) will cause unwanted orbital resonance effects that will gradually shift the orbit of areostationary satellites.^{[citation needed]}

The citation needed is well deserved. It stands to reason that Phobos and Deimos are too small to have a substantial effect on the orbit of a satellite, with Phobos having just 1/7000000th the mass of Earth's moon, and Deimos being 1/5th as large as Phobos.

I did some original research using numerical simulation which shows that Phobos does shift the orbit, but does so extremely slowly, less than 1 arcsecond per month, and the stationkeeping requirements to account for the influence of Phobos, while real, would be very small (probably less than 0.05 m/s per year). It is hard to find any published research references to perturbations caused by Phobos and Deimos on the orbits of martian satellites and those references generally just dismiss the moons stating the lumpiness of the martian gravity field is much more significant. Furthermore, original research again, it would seem that for a typical solar-powered satellite radiation pressure from the Sun would generally exceed the effect of the gravity of Phobos.

While I only have original research to indicate that this section is substantially incorrect/misleading I could also find no references to it being substantially correct. A section on stationkeeping should either go into the actual factors (lumpiness of martian gravity, sun's gravity, radiation pressure, Phobos and Deimos) and their respective magnitudes, or this section as it currently is should be removed as being vague and misleading.

BlakeMM (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]