Talk:Ardhanarishvara/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk) 12:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 12:06, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
  2. Just a few proposed changes to improve clarity. Very well written and researched.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  3. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  4. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  5. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  6. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  7. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  8. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Comments[edit]

  1. Another great Hinduism article. Thanks for all your hard work. -- Lemurbaby (talk) 23:37, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]