Talk:Applied ontology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics

Looking for more resources[edit]

I am looking to put together a bibliography of Applied Ontological works. I think the article calls for more papers on application than on theory but whatever people have! Alex Jackl 16:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Applied ontology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The link "formalontology.org" appeared to go to an Asian housewife helping site now (based on translate). The other "update" led to a 404 error. These are good corrections. (Editor's note: I read this backwards the first time and marked it as "failed". That was an error on my part.) Alex Jackl (talk) 14:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Landmark[edit]

I just noticed a user took out the connection to Landmark as there was not a reference. The Steve Zaffron reference in the footnotes is the connection to that. Landmark is an organization that supplies training in applied ontology so is directly relevant. Alex Jackl (talk) 15:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Someone reverted this again without explaining. This is a clear sourced addition that has been part of the article from the beginning . Please discuss here. Alex Jackl (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Applied ontology as a category[edit]

I would suggest to consider creating a new category "Applied ontology", as it would serve as an upper category for such pages such as "Ontology (information science)", "Social ontology", "Political ontology", "Cognitive ontology" and other branches. Bikandr (talk) 12:27, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]