Talk:Apostolic Constitutions

Catholic Enyclopedia

from [1]:

"There were, however, in the East, from the early days up to the end of the fifth century, certain writings, closely related to each other, and which were in reality brief canon law treatises on ecclesiastical administration the duties of the clergy and the faithful, and especially on the liturgy. We refer to works attributed to the Apostles, very popular in the Oriental Churches, though devoid of official authority, and which may be called pseudo-epigraphic, rather than apocryphal. The principal writings of this kind are the "Teaching of the Twelve Apostles" or "Didache", the "Didascalia", based on the "Didache"; the "Apostolic Constitutions", an expansion of the two preceding works; then the "Apostolic Church Ordinance", the "Definitio canonica SS. Apostolorum", the "Testament of the Lord" and the "Octateuch of Clement"; lastly the "Apostolic Canons". Of all this literature, only the "Apostolic Canons" werein cluded in the canonical collections of the Greek Church. The most important of these documents the "Apostolic Constitutions", was removed by the Second Canon of the Council in Trullo (692), as having been interpolated by the heretics. As to the eighty-five Apostolic Canons, accepted by the same council, they rank yet first in the above-mentioned "Apostolic" collection; the first fifty translated into Latin by Dionysius Exiguus (c. 500), were included in the Western collections and afterwards in the "Corpus Juris"."

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.201.25.60 (talk • contribs) .

?209.78.19.130 20:41, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Article introduction does not make sense.

In the first sentence the article states, "...collection of eight treatises which belongs the...", which does not make sense. I believe it should read "...which belongs to the...", as this makes the most sense to me, but as I am no scholar of RC theology I cannot be 100% certain (just 99.9%). Regardless it is incorrect English as it stands and needs to be fixed by someone who doesn't somehow manage to unintentionally fuck up articles every time he tries to fix anything the way I do. This is not the only error in the introduction, much less the entire article, but it is the most glaring one I have noticed. GlassDeviant (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apostolic Constitutions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100829192040/http://www.bible-researcher.com/apostolic.html to http://www.bible-researcher.com/apostolic.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)