Talk:Apollinarism

Catholicism Low‑importance

Apollinarism is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

New Adventus Spiritum[edit]

I made Two Corrections. The first is, New Advent does not say "that Jesus had a normal human body but a divine mind instead of a regular human soul."

Rather, it says this.

"A Christological theory, according to which Christ had a human body and a human sensitive soul, but no human rational mind, the Divine Logos taking the place of this last."

The Soul and Spirit are not the same Thing. Which is also what I corrected in The Body replacing or with and. To make this Clear as it is not sell understood today.

SKWills (talk) 20:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiliam Lane Craig[edit]

The assertion that Dr William Lane Craig holds neo-Apollinarian views appears to be an unwarranted and contentious slur. The reference to the Lane Craig and Moreland book does not in itself provide warrant for this assertion, absent a reference showing that the book in question does advance neo-Apollinarian views. If the assertion cannot be substantiated, then it should be deleted. Spivoxity (talk) 23:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, this article http://www.reasonablefaith.org/christological-conundrums on Craig's website does describe his view as 'neo-Apollinarian'. Spivoxity (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I gather that needs further clarification. As far as I know, Dr. William Lane Craig does not deny that human nature is made of body and soul. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.193.184.192 (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]