Talk:Anneline Kriel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Later in 1989, she married the millionaire horse breeder Philip Tucker in Johannesburg, where they resided; the couple had two children, Tayla and Witney. They divorced five years later, in 1994.


Я сильно сомневаюсь, что речь шла именно об этом мужчине. Не факт, что он вообще в ЮАР был когда-то. Schekinov Alexey Victorovich (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Hi, I just added a link to Roy Hilligenn - I made his page and he was mentioned in this page. Thanks. -Enarowski (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anneline Kriel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tabloid journalism[edit]

User:Chrisanthusjohn Don't you think parts of the article – like the dress stuff – fall under WP:NOTGOSSIP? Maddy from Celeste (they/she) 20:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but I would still keep the bit about dress since it is apparently on public display so that to me seems more notable than mere tabloid gossip. Feel free to delete more if you feel there is too much non-notable info. If other editors disagree, they will revert and then there will be a chance to discuss. Chrisanthusjohn (talk) 20:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Moved tag here from main page as article is now in much better shape following my edits and referencing.

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]