Talk:Anne Hathaway/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 ← Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7
This page is an Archive of the discussions from Talk:Anne Hathaway.
(January 2013 - December 2017) - Please Do not edit!

Anne's "golden globes"

Could someone please fix the picture? It has been vandalised and is rather vulgar. 105.236.78.72 (talk) 12:46, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Academy Award in lead sentence

I noticed a remark regarding the inclusion of Academy Award winning in the lead sentence. That is POV/undue, and should not go in the first sentence I would like to discuss this. It has also been mentioned that She is not defined by an award but is not an Academy Award the pinnacle or defining moment for an actor/actress? I see it as very defining and along that line of thought I would submit other examples to you such as
Barack Obama being president is not defining. He's just a politician. Rod Steiger lead sentence uses the contested descriptor and I'm sure I could find another. and in a further reaching attempt to clarify our stance on this regarding a biographical article how would you edit this lead sentence? James_B._Bullard I'm not looking to have my revision to Anne Hathaway reverted, rather a discussion with experienced editors who see things a bit differently than me. So that maybe we/I can come away from this with a different view. I feel it is not POV to use the epitome of accolades in a given chosen profession in his or her biographical article. One final example, a list of the Noble Laureates. Many have that prize in their lead sentence why should Anne Hathaway not be allowed to have her prize as a descriptor? Granted an Academy Award can not be any further from a Noble Prize but it [IS] their defining moment. Geremy Hebert (talk | contribs) 20:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

I agree with your logic and think it would be completely appropriate to include it in the lead. Rreagan007 (talk) 00:50, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
It does go in the lede, but it does not go in the first sentence. There is a big difference, and this is the general consensus on articles of Academy Award winners. Nymf talk to me 06:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

News articles about how much people supposedly hate Anne Hathaway

I've read news articles from women saying that people are supposedly annoyed at Anne Hathaway. They "hate" her because she is supposedly overly dramatic, apologizes too much in public for trivial misdeeds (such as not wearing the dress to an award ceremony that you're supposed to wear), and is very enthusiastic about life, or something like that. I wonder if mention of this alleged annoyance has any place in the article on Anne Hathaway, or is that too POV? 198.151.130.41 (talk) 18:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

If it is accurately covered in real reliable, secondary sources then there is no reason to exclude it from the article. Can you link us to some of the articles here so we can evaluate them? Elizium23 (talk) 18:55, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Seems like slander to me, but let's look at what sources the IP propose we use. Nymf talk to me 20:47, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Truth is an absolute defense to slander/libel. But any negative info about someone on a biography article must be well sourced to reliable sources. Otherwise, Wikipedia could be guilty of libel if it turns out not to be true. Rreagan007 (talk) 21:01, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
We're pretending this doesn't happen, apparently, even though it IS truth and not slander. Gwyneth Paltrow was also on that list of hated celebrities. --98.246.156.76 (talk) 03:08, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Anne Hathaway's Native American Ancestry.

Anne Hathaway DOES have Native American ancestry! The IMDB source is valid and correct. The very same quote where she states that she has Native American ancestry can be found in her published biography (https://books.google.com/books?id=LBBXmGi9UxUC&pg=PP11&lpg=PP11&dq=native+american+anne+hathaway&source=bl&ots=FtnBH2-C_n&sig=GqEmlbYM9EKvEGX86XOLanIVMbM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwivjoiYs-LMAhWFSiYKHYzuB4UQ6AEIjgEwFw#v=onepage&q=native%20american%20anne%20hathaway&f=false) and many other sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akosiyavre (talk • contribs) 00:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Anne Hathaway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Requested move (dissent)

The Requested move(s) above seems similar to Apple vs Apple Inc. at Apple (disambiguation). I'm not about to reopen the division with an RM as it's not as clearcut (bio vs BLP). It seems a similar case of encyclopaedic/enduring value vs (current) popularity. It does seems clear to me that given WP:ten year test this is likely to be revisited in a long-timescale outside of 10 years, but that is currently a WP:CRYSTALBALL. Widefox; talk 22:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

The photo of her for the info box is CREEPY!

GET A BETTER PHOTO OF HER CAUSE THAT PHOTO IS REALLY CREEPY! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.10.31.54 (talk) 23:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Just a quick note on the current photo used in the infobox. It isn't a very good photo so if there is a replacement it would be good form to change it... Dr.khatmando (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

 Done. - Station1 (talk) 17:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Anne Hathaway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anne Hathaway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anne_Hathaway/Archive_6&oldid=1136522175"