Talk:Anemonoides quinquefolia

Requested move 19 July 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: uncontested move. DrKay (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anemone quinquefolia → Anemonoides quinquefolia – Updated name accepted in secondary sources such as Plants of the World Online.[1] Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 21:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but why not just move it yourself, or request via the non-controversial track? Abductive (reasoning) 05:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, and I'd be happy to just do it, but the whole issue of splitting Anemone s.l. into separate genera needs a more integrated approach. @Abductive: thus you created Anemonastrum, which is part of the split, and then between us we moved the relevant species articles. What's really needed, I think, is:

– Explaining the splits and genera at Anemone#Taxonomy

– Making sure all the genus articles exist (e.g. Anemonoides doesn't right now).

– Moving all the relevant the species articles.

Peter coxhead (talk) 09:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

why not just move it yourself - I don't remember exactly, but I probably tried and couldn't, since the page for Anemonoides quinquefolia already existed and I don't have the required tools. —Hyperik ⌜talk⌟ 19:07, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]