Talk:Andris Nelsons

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Daughter's family name[edit]

For crying out loud, could the various, presumably Latvian, editors (21.trolejbuss, InLatvianFemaleNamesEndsWithEorA, Aiviekste, Riga Daugava) please agree on his daughter's family name, Nelsons or Nelsone? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that your question was intended sarcastically, since I am willing to guess without doing a formal investigation that all 4 of the above editors on Andris Nelsons' page are the same person. (Of course, there is also another idiot wikipedian who continually cites Norman Lebrecht's blog as a reliable reference source.) Cheers, DJRafe (talk) 17:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
and I repeat that the family name of a baby is not needed until that girl is notable herself, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why speculative text does not belong in a wikipedia article[edit]

The essay by Martin Kettle is certainly entertaining reading, but it is speculation on who Rattle's successor could be. The whole point of wikipedia is to be an objective source of documented facts. Speculation is just that: 'speculation'. Speculation on what could or might happen has absolutely no place in a wikipedia article, which again (and I will repeat it until the message registers, so we could be here a while) is meant to be a clearly documented record of facts that have actually occurred. Kettle names other conductors who could be contenders for the Berlin post. Does that mean that each conductor should have such gossip mentioned in wikipedia? No, it does not.

Besides that, the Kettle essay as a reference was not properly formatted. But that is a moot point, because it does not report an actual appointment to the orchestra. DJRafe (talk) 06:18, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are the page's original author, I will give in and let you have your way. However, you don't seem to realize the extent to which Nelsons is being projected, nor how serious this would be for him. I cited the article simply to back up my insertion, although he is being talked about all over the web. To call this "gossip" is ridiculous, considering his credentials and the seriousness of his "candidacy". German newspapers were citing him as a threat to Rattle's position before Rattle announced his resignation. The idea that speculation has no place on Wikipedia is also clearly flawed. Have you ever visited pages for politicians? I agree that such speculation should be used in moderation, but when the top job in Classical music is in question, that's another story. User: Andrewbarnard —Preceding undated comment added 14:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andris Nelsons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

An editor deleted this widely covered statement by Nelsons, apparently not believing that two RSs were sufficient. Perhaps he wants to conceal it; who knows. I've of course restored it, with additional RS refs.--2604:2000:E016:A700:7057:AD6C:8DD4:947A (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Andris Nelsons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Andris_Nelsons&oldid=1212389447"