Talk:Andreas Poach

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

he took the Philippist position[edit]

not Philippist, but Flacian Rasool (talk) 16:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to look for evidence he was a Flacist and couldn't find anything; his antinomian views were the opposite of the Flacian position. Also, he was not gnesio-Lutheran enough to take that position at Jena; though he is described as one here:[1]. I do not mean that he was a Philippist through-and-through, only that he took the Philippist position on this one topic. For example, the Philippists tended to be more conciliatory towards Roman Catholics than Poach was.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 06:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]