Talk:Amusement with prize

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved: no opposition DrKiernan (talk) 16:35, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

– Not proper nouns. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support There seems to be a widespread misconception that phrases referred to by initialisms or acronyms are capitalized as proper nouns. It's appropriate in some cases in prose, but not for titles. --BDD (talk) 04:21, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct sir. Main battle tank for example. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 10:15, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support This is not a phrase that would be used in American English, but UK google"Amusement+With+Prize" shows it is used both with and without caps. Apteva (talk) 06:27, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.