Talk:American folk music revival

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American folk music revival article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Regional and national music Mid‑importance

	American folk music revival is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roots music High‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent reversion of large addition[edit]

I concur with Sensei48's reversion of the large addition, but maybe from an additional angle. I think that degree of relevance, impact in the subject area, should be taken into account along with prominence and commercial success. I did a medium speed pass through the references at the Chapin article and the only genre statement I found in them in them said "pop". I would probably say "singer-songwriter" first, "pop" second and "folk" third. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Billie Holliday?[edit]

I am wondering if Billie Holliday really belongs in the lede, or anywhere in the article, and actually the same is true for Bessie Smith & Ma Rainey. My inclination is to remove them but not right away, give you a chance to defend their placement. Carptrash (talk) 16:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Those names were added to the lead by @Modernist:, pinging for input. Schazjmd (talk) 16:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a fan (I have an image of her on my home page) but IMO she is clearly not folk music. The term isn't even mentioned once in her article. I'll take her out, feel free to put her back in if anyone feels otherwise. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 17:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ma Rainey and Bessie Smith were influential and admired by Odetta, Dylan, Joan Baez, and most of the major stars of the folk revival, they belong...Modernist (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We probably should change wording to clarify.....in essence along the lines of what you just said. The current wording sort of implies that they were early folk musicians. North8000 (talk) 01:37, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted my removal of those two. North8000 (talk) 01:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CIO[edit]

The CIO is/was not a union but a union centre/federation 2A02:C7C:362A:E200:A134:6296:7F4F:4675 (talk) 10:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now corrected. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]