This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
No mention of the Locomotive in the picture in the article? This deeply displeases me. --293.xx.xxx.xx 10:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, considering the article was just created yesterday, of course it won't have everything. Not only that, but there is nothing stopping you from adding to the article if you cite your work.--Kranar drogin 10:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with Kranar, though I plan on adding it soon, suggest watching the page. : ) IvoShandor 12:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article says that when it was authorised the Illinois Central was the "largest" railroad in the world. What does this mean? It can't mean biggest turnover or largest number of passengers because it wasn't even built. Nice piece otherwise.
Thanks. Wording altered, check it now. IvoShandor 07:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]