Talk:Amberley Museum & Heritage Centre

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amberley Museum & Heritage Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070510101949/http://www.connected-earth.com/ to http://www.connected-earth.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Selection of images[edit]

Images for this article should in my opinion reflect the diversity and ambiance of the museum. Also note Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images. Especially as the Amberley Museum Railway has its own article there should be at most one railway image in this article. There appears to have been a long standing bias with transport images and possibly emphasis on the individual transport item and with that in mind I will attempt to change images and a little content to match that diversity from the selection available on the commons.Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC) Okay I've had shot at providing a diverse range of images. I've tweaked the article content to help images be near content and checked the overall rendering seems acceptable on both narrow and wider screens and on a mobile device and it seems ok. But I know images choices are always subjective and I am not always the best I am colour defective which doesn't help! Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job, I've changed the railway image as the original is over-exposed. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]