Talk:Amanita

I wonder if the Edibility section would be more readable if it were a series of four bullet lists instead of four paragraphs. I don't see the species list mentioned below by Casliber - must have been edited out? Opinions on bullet listing? I know on some pages the bullet lists are way too long but I don't think that would be the case here and the paragraphs seem awkward and unclear. Dog Walking Girl (talk) 05:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

OK - the species list now has toxicity icon next to it. I hope everyone likes it :)Cas Liber 06:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

File:Amanita-phalloides.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Amanita-phalloides.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Amanita-phalloides.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:55, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

need of evidence

Is it necessary, anything I add should have a evidence? Dhvani Yadav (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes, all added information needs a citation from a reliable source. Sasata (talk) 18:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amanita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121006231936/http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/main.htm to http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/main.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)