Talk:Alpha 2000

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a merge proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robin 2160 appears to be a poor quality dupilcate of part of this page.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC) Agree with merger proposal - same basic design of aircraft, different name. Aircraft which have multiple articles (C130 / C130J for example) tend to have huge articles, not stubs. Problems - should it also be merged with earlier Robin types? Which name would you use - first name for the type or last? Winstonwolfe (talk) 07:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - but under the Robin titles until production exceeds that of the originals at least. The convention is article titles should reflect the common usage names, which Alpha aviation 2000 certainly isn't. Nothing that a re-direct can't put right though. Apart from that the Al[pha aviation articles are verging on self promotion and/or advertising.Petebutt (talk) 21:53, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to re-iterate my points Alpha aviation has gone bust, so definitely revert to Robin titles!!!!!!!!!!!Petebutt (talk) 21:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a merge proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.