Talk:Albertino Mussato

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Albertino Mussato. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926235107/http://www.wayneturney.20m.com/neoclassiccritics.htm to http://www.wayneturney.20m.com/neoclassiccritics.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100628194418/http://tell.fll.purdue.edu/RLA-Archive/1989/ItalianTamburri-html/Zupan-FF.htm to http://tell.fll.purdue.edu/RLA-Archive/1989/ItalianTamburri-html/Zupan-FF.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Northern Italian?

Seriously? Has this edit been made by a leghista? ( 09:07, 25 March 2015‎ Fhamado (talk | contribs)‎ . . (4,164 bytes) (+1,368)‎ ) and never been revised in three years?

As there isn't such administrative and political entity as Northern Italy (and certainly there wasn't in 13th century !!) so as to give a 'nationality' (as opposed for example to Northern Ireland) I demand that this crap be removed from the lead of the article (usually the only thing people read, to get an idea about the subject).

Also, please note that all references and other articles, even in other languages, refer to him and his mentor as 'Italian' (even Lovato Lovati's English-language article state that he was an Italian scholar from Padua) so all statements about a phantom "Northern Italian nationality" should be removed. Would you read in a textbook that Petrarch was a "Central Italian" poet/scholar just because he was Tuscan? Geez! And the fact that this piece of dung has appeared on the main page speaks volumes about the lack of quality of this "encyclopaedia"!87.4.94.152 (talk) 23:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)CuriousE