Talk:Albertaceratops

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

"Medusaceratops" is here mentioned as synonym. As the name however has never been published with an intention of conferring a genus name to a certain fossil, it is not a synonym.--MWAK 10:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was known as such, though. Should the taxobox mention be removed, then? The place in the article where it is mentioned does not explicitely call it a taxonomic synonym. J. Spencer 14:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the taxobox mention would be best. As it is now, it's ambiguous. Many will at first blush assume it's a junior synonym. Why else would it be in a taxobox? :o).--MWAK 07:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's done. J. Spencer 14:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Mr Nesmo. Your 15 minutes are up.[edit]

"The dinosaur's current species' name, A. nesmoi, is derived from the name of Cecil Nesmo, a rancher ..." With all due respect to Mr. Nesmo, it seems unlikely that a separate Wikipedia article on him is merited. -- 201.51.231.176 20:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. J. Spencer 21:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Medusaceratops[edit]

Turns out it's not the same species, after all [1] Pikolas (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albertaceratops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070227122814/http://www.csotonyi.com/Albertaceratops_Rough.html to http://www.csotonyi.com/Albertaceratops_Rough.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]