Talk:Albert E. Richardson (inventor)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Requested move 6 May 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved b uidhe 22:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Albert E. Richardson → Albert Edward Richardson – adding full name for the inventor of a tea maker, can provide genealogical evidence if required TeasmadeQueen (talk) 13:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request. – Ammarpad (talk) 15:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

His full name does not appear to be his common name, although Albert Richardson may be. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, WP:COMMONNAME doesn't seem to include Edward.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. We don't use full names unless they were actually used. But move to Albert Richardson (inventor), as his middle initial doesn't seem to be commonly used either. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME ~ HAL 333 21:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.