This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer articles
The contents of the Alberget 4A page were merged into Djurgårdens IF on 29 April 2014 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
I removed the merge tag there was no consensus to merge. Two keeps and four merges (one was a !vote with no rational), should have been an admin close as AfD came directly from DRV. I'm not going to question it though, just retain article as keep or no consensus. Valoemtalkcontrib 15:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There was a clear consensus to merge. Also consensus isn't based on head-count, but the strength of arguments, and the two keep !votes were not policy-based. If you disagree than you can raise it at WP:DRV. ArmbrustTheHomunculus 16:27, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with this outcome, the article came from DRV I would request an admin close in this case. Valoemtalkcontrib 16:30, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The fact, that you disagree with the outcome, doesn't mean it's in any way wrong. ArmbrustTheHomunculus 16:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, I am not saying it is wrong, just that I feel an admin close is more appropriate especially in the case of this contention. Regardless, this is not a topic I care too deeply about, I was able to find additional sources and non admin closes are always open to bold restores when contested. Right now I do not have time to add additional sources so either way works. Valoemtalkcontrib 16:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If the close is right, than there is no reason to overturn it. ArmbrustTheHomunculus 16:43, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
