Talk:Akabira

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 15 July 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved, per consensus here, and from the concept of RfC mentioned in the discussion. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



– No need for prefectural disambiguation. Using searches through Special:PrefixIndex, there appears no other topics under the exact titles of majority of the above-mentioned Hokkaido cities - per WP:CONCISE and WP:PRECISE at WP:AT. For some with multiple topics bearing those names, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC prevails via readership stats (as of 9 pm, Manila time):

The readership stats are based on the pages' page information details. The use of readership stats is based on the opinion of @Sitta kah: in an old RM discussion at Talk:Zamboanga City. Such usage of stats is, according to Sitta kah, a great way of determining the PRIMARYTOPIC.

However, my proposed RM for Kushiro will be dealt in a separate RM, since it has numerous listings at Special:PrefixIndex/Kushiro, and the total of readers of other topics is close to the readership of the Kushiro city article (causing some debate), yet its base name is a redirect to the city article itself.

Update: I have initiated an RM at Talk:Kushiro, Hokkaido#Requested move 15 July 2020. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:07, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This RM is also in accordance to the general consensus at "Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Japan-related articles/Archive 27#RfC: Mandatory disambiguation for Japanese places?," which agrees that uniquely-named Japanese cities do not require provincial disambiguation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Support Using the prefecture name in the title is not needed due to WP:CONCISE Mrpants106 (talk) 20:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support each of these places has enough of a reputation to be a primary topic encyclopedically. —innotata 15:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.