Talk:Aequorea victoria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should this really be renamed to Aequorea aequorea ?--Budlight 02:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also this article needs a little bit of a rewrite. --Budlight 02:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a great idea to rename this page Aequorea aequorea, since the specialists haven't decided whether or not A. victoria, A. forskalea and A. aequorea are the same or different. Until this is decided (probably using DNA) it is foolish to make such a decision by changing the name of a Wikipedia page. Aequorea forskalea has been identified in the Moray Firth in Scotland as early as 1949, and later synonymized to A. aequorea (see PL Kramp, 1961), and the "unique" report (unreferenced in this article) of A. victoria in the Moray Firth is most likely a case of the difficulty in putting names on these medusae with few features, that look very similar, and is likely the same species that has been reported there before, by another name. Leuckartiara (talk) 07:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aequorea victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]