Talk:Acromioclavicular joint

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Untitled[edit]

The quote about the Weaver-Dunn procedure only being 50% successful ought to be referenced. It may be the case with the strict "Weaver-Dunn" but I've heard of Modified Weaver-Dunn surgeries being 75% to 95% succesful. Unfortunately, I can't prove this sucess rate, but on most papers or abstracts I've read, the success rate is much higher, although it is short turn. Even take a look here Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction Using Gore-Tex Tape (Stone Clinic) Almost all surgeries listed at the bottom mention a good majority having either Excellent or Good results. 24.0.33.86 15:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The last edits I made make this article more about acromioclavicular joint separations than about the joint itself. Is there an easy way (other than copying/pasting that will split the article into "separated shoulder" and Acromioclavicular joint? I want to create a new page but I don't want ot loose the edit history. Root4(one) 17:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved injury section to Separated shoulder. Anybody objecting please object here. Root4(one) 20:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

type of joint[edit]

It says in the article that the AC joint is a pivot joint. I believe it is a gliding synovial joint, so I changed that paragraph. Provophys 22:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acromioclavicular joint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]