Talk:Accident analysis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why has the "See also" to "Why-Because Analysis", a method of accident analysis, been removed? An why has the "See also" to "Future Studies", nothing todo with Accident Analysis, been included,

Merge[edit]

I started creating the Accident investigation article, then ran across this one. Both need lots of work. I'm not sure which title is best, or if there are other alternatives. Is "accident analysis" a technical term, or perhaps the more common British usage? Dhaluza 17:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the merge. Accident analysis is better term I think. -- Magioladitis 06:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis vs. Investigation[edit]

I see the dilemma. As a student of Human Resources Management dealing with OH&S programs as well, I came to this site and searched for Accident investigation. Under this title I expected to find a lot more information, and a category that also encompassed areas of, procedures, benefits, and "analysis". As part of the investigation, analysis is an essential part, I beleive that anyone needing this information, personally, will want to understand how to investigate accidents, in this category I think we should also address the analysis that individuals will use. My answer: "Accident Investigation", the benefits, highlights, important need to understand information, and where information can be found for "accident analysis". --WikdwitchNof7 15:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accident analysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Models" section[edit]

This section basically has nothing in it right now. I tried to clean it up, but it's still pretty empty. I don't have access to the book, so I can't quote or describe the models list referred to here. It might be better to just take this section out and put Enhancing Occupational Safety and Health in a "Further reading" section unless Law3giver (talk · contribs) can add the info.SaAnKe (talk) 22:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Environmental Pollution and System Safety Mgmt- Student Projects[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 1 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JeffreySalisbury, Talomani, AALSAIF3, Saveret1 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by UCIHGrad18 (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]