Talk:Acceleration clause

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acceleration clause. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050330090658/http://www.quazell.com:80/BusinessLetters/ltrpromnot3.html to http://www.quazell.com/BusinessLetters/ltrpromnot3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content Removal[edit]

The example content and the contract language content has been removed, because such constitutes the unlawful practice of law, per the relevant jurisdictions in the United States. See e.g. Texas Government Code 81.101, which prohibits describing specific contract language (i.e. preparing a contract) if one is not a member of the bar. See http://www.txuplc.org/Home/applaw for more information. USN007 (talk) 02:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens, this language was written by a bar-admitted attorney. Also, Texas law can't override the basic First Amendment right to present a sample contractual clause. If they want to stop us from doing this, let them come for us. bd2412 T 04:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]