This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Hughesdarren, I noticed that you recently marked this article as reviewed. I also saw the article in the new pages feed and thought about redirecting it to Atwell Mill Grove or List of largest giant sequoias, as I couldn't find enough coverage of the tree to pass GNG. Could you explain why you think this tree passes our notability guidelines? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 01:18, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Lord Bolingbroke, I thought the tree having it's own page (Famous Redwoods) and being in the top 30 of the world gave it enough notability to pass through but if you don't feel that way then I'm not going to stop a redirect. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 02:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hughesdarren, I don't feel too strongly either way. I'm not sure that FamousRedwoods.com qualifies as a reliable source. However, I notice that many of the articles in Category:Individual giant sequoia trees and Category:Individual trees in California aren't much better in terms of sourcing, and most of those have existed for years without their notability being challenged; an AfD would probably be useful to set a precedent for pages of this type. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 02:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
