This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
A fact from Aboriginal title in New York appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
A wiki article's lead sentence is supposed to have the form, A foo is a bar, baz, quux. This article's lead supposes we know what the title refers to before it has been defined. I have 'aboriginal' title to my car registered in the state of New York. Is the article about my car, somehow? How do we know the article is about dispossessing Indians of their lands? We need a better opening. Sbalfour (talk) 17:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That whole section tells me nothing. At the end of the day, who has/had title to what, and how did they get/lose it? I think it's reasonable to delete the whole section - I get it that aboriginal land titles in NY are contentious, but
this list belongs in a research law article, not in the encyclopedia. The list itself might qualify as a kind of original research - what source says these cases have particular relevance to land titles? Checking other similar articles, Aboriginal title in <state>, I don't see bare lists of mostly tangential litigated cases. Someone needs to pare this list and justify what remains on it, i.e. by results. Sbalfour (talk) 21:59, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted the section. To reinstate, pare by relevance, and insert text as to that relevance, and cite source as to relevance. Sbalfour (talk) 22:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
