Talk:A moron in a hurry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reason for spike in views[edit]

Just for anyone who cares to look at the views per day, you may notice that there has recently been a MASSIVE spike in views. http://stats.grok.se/en/201109/A_moron_in_a_hurry I believe that this is due to Notch posting about it on his blog (http://notch.tumblr.com/post/10814623188/the-eventual-release-and-the-legal-documents) Just FYI for the curious. :D Jessemv (talk) 04:23, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Offensive?[edit]

i have been chastised in the realworld for using "moron"; it is apparently one of those words like "retard" and "midget" which are now considered offensive. is it appropriate for people to use this expression in wiki articles (one of which brought me here), much less courtrooms?

i can think of some choice expressions using the N-word, epithets for Jews, etc., but i don't hear people dropping them casually into articles like they do with this expression. 66.105.218.30 (talk) 01:30, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not only in trademark/copyright cases[edit]

The article suggests that this phrase is used only in copyright cases, but e.g. the judge in the Sally Bercow vs. Lord McAlpine twitter defamation case stated that "only a moron in a hurry would be unaware of the context of the tweet". 78.21.0.194 (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A moron in a hurry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]