Talk:A Buyer's Market

Novels High‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

Not a Review or Spoiler[edit]

This page does not need a Spoiler warning nor a flag for correction due to sounding like a review. It does not review or spoil. It tells only the characters and setting. Nowhere does it reveal any event or occurence in the book, accept in broad terms by mentioning an entrance into society. That is like letting out the spoiler that Harry Potter is about wizards. The only possible biased word here is calling it Anthony Powell's "masterpiece", which is justified as it is generally regarded one of the greatest works of the century and was included on Modern Library's Top 100 works of the century. Compare this write-up to that of the first book in the series A Question of Upbringing, which is what I modeled it after. Hellycopper 04:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]