Talk:A Benihana Christmas/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   Well done.

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

   The infobox seems out of place. Is it suppose to be like that? The article has a "red link", if it doesn't have an article, it would be best to un-link it, per here.

   Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   Is TV.com a reliable source?

   Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   If the above statement can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:09, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

As for the infobox, I'd say it should be changed to the one used in Night Out, Survivor Man, Branch Wars, etc. Mastrchf (^t/_c) 23:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

TV.com is owned by CNET Networks, a trusted news source. RedThunder 00:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Fixed the infobox --Mr.crabby (Talk) 00:13, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, I have questioned the reliability of TV.com in several of the Office's episodes. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I would like to thank Red Thunder for being patient in this review, but it needs to be clear that I was just doing my job of making sure that the article met GA standards. With that being said, congratulations, you know have a GA in your midst. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)