Talk:ANSI T1.413 Issue 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ANSI T1.413 Issue 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Baud =/= frames per second[edit]

"The data frame rate (baud rate) is 4,000 frames per second." Huh? Baud is symbols per second, not frames. How many symbols are sent over T1.413? - Theaveng (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I think nowdays we would just say the baud rate is 4000 per second. Times 254 subcarriers times 15 bits per subcarrier symbol (3810 bits per baud) equals the 15.24 Mbit/s rate. This is just the modulation, and several more layers (e.g. ATM and an adaption layer, I guess) would be required before one gets to a "packet" or Ethernet frame equivalent, so very different. Needs be explained much better, and with sources. W Nowicki (talk) 23:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious question[edit]

What happened to Issue 1???? If nobody objects, we should probably move it to a simpler name ANSI T1.413 since that seems unqiue for these many years. W Nowicki (talk) 23:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]