Talk:25 cm schwerer Minenwerfer

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Article Naming[edit]

The lemma should be "25 cm schwerer Minenwerfer", as this is the correct form when used without article, or with indefinite article (ein schwerer..., but der schwere...). See also here. --Dekthep (talk) 03:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC) [native German speaker][reply]

Claim on effectiveness of shell[edit]

"...its massive shells were nearly as effective at penetrating fortifications as the largest siege guns in the German inventory, like the 42 cm Dicke Bertha...". This is rubbish - there is no comparison between the effect of an 820 kg and a 100 kg shell. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]