Talk:2017 Australian Open – Women's singles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Where is it "common practice" to include flags before a result is known?[edit]

Pretty sure any newspaper editor would reject such a diagram and tell the writer to get rid of the flag. It just looks odd, unprofessional, geeky even. Show me one single professional publication that does it. MaxBrowne (talk) 01:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone on Wikipedia does it - includes a flag for the next round if two players from the same country are playing. And I'm not going to argue or continue past this point. Thanks. MasterMind5991 (talk) 06:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Everyone on wikipedia does it" is a pathetically weak argument. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - we don't know that both players won't withdraw or be disqualified. Besides, it adds no information to the article. MaxBrowne (talk) 07:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2017 Australian Open – Women's Singles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]