Talk:2016–17 RFU Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

London Welsh[edit]

Although London Welsh's matches will not appear in the league table at the end of the year, the results should not be deleted. The matches occurred, and this article will be a reference. Jowaninpensans (talk) 18:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned this on another page but this London Welsh liquidation seems to have caused a degree of chaos. Like Jowaninpensans I think that we should keep the current results that have involved London Welsh (as I have done with the British and Irish Cup) including attendances in those games and also the scorers. If you were to eliminate all traces of the games involving London Welsh you would need to remove all attendances involving the club and the top scorers/try scorers list would have to change. A suggestion is that a note is added to each result reinforcing the fact that the game does not count as far as the league table is concerned but that other elements such as attendances and player stats do. Otherwise you have a near impossible task which would be plagued with further inaccuracies. (Jgjsmith006) 18:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, leave LW in there because we can't deny they didn't take part in it. Just a note near the top that LW were expelled for being liquidated and the phoenix entity did not present a valid case to keep them competing in rest of the season. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 18:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attendance Table[edit]

London Scottish entry appears to be wrong as it's just a duplicate of London Irish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.177.38 (talk) 07:28, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have now reverted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.177.38 (talk) 07:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016–17 RFU Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]