This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
2013 in paleontology is part of WikiProject Turtles, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use turtle resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.TurtlesWikipedia:WikiProject TurtlesTemplate:WikiProject Turtlesturtle articles
{{Extinct turtles}} and fossil forms of both living and extinct turtles requires attention:many extinct articles require either expansion or creation and sources seems hard to come by. A list of fossil forms is being compiled so progress can be charted.
Patrol: recent changes to turtle articles and check for improvements or errors.
The page grew so large that editing it is problematic at this point, so I have a question: would anyone mind if I were to split archosaur and mammal discoveries into separate articles, like it was done with the article 2012 in paleontology?.--Macrochelys (talk) 13:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it's better to have a "2013 in vertebrate paleontology" article? Rnnsh (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Such a page would, however, contain the majority of the taxa listed in the current version of the article, and might be comparably difficult to edit.--Macrochelys (talk) 19:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support split - Article is over 300 kB and some of the 16 major sections can be divided off. Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
