Talk:2011–12 DFB-Pokal

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Germany / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the German football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Bold display of advanced teams, usage of uncollapsed football box from quarterfinals, use of flags in season infoboxes[edit]

Just for curiosity, why has the bold accentuation for advanced teams, as seen in revision, been reverted? It would be a nice feature to have, especially as Template:Football box collapsible finally supports the syntax needed for this (which was not the case some six to nine months ago). Alternatively, how about using the regular font style for preview lines in said template?

Also, I always thought that it had been consensus to use Template:Football box for quarterfinal matches and beyond, at least for those cup season articles with a larger number of participants like the FA Cup, Copa del Rey, Coppa Italia and so on. However, I have been largely inactive for the last seven to eight months due to university work, so I might have missed a change in consensus if there had been one. Could anybody be so kind and provide me an update? :-)

Finally, and yes, I know that this is inconsistently applied on various kinds of season articles, but could we please remove any flags from the infoboxes, including those for best goalscorers of a tournament? Aside from the usual WP:FLAG issues, there is simply no need to display them as the focus is on a national cup competition. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 10:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The bold issue is more convention than anything else. None of the previous season articles using the current format have this feature. In my opnion it just looks bad, and with score clearly displayed it's not as if there is any confusion as to which club won a given match. As for the other issues, I agree entirely and will get around to changing later today. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2011–12 DFB-Pokal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090609211623/http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=460546 to http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=460546
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scw2000.de/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]