Talk:2010 La Manga Cup

{{editsemiprotected}} Not Protected and No Question! Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Match Reports[edit]

I notice that the match reports are not filled in on the box scores. I followed the links in the references section and couldn't find any match details for the 2010 edition of the cup. The data on this page needs to be verifiable, so please make use of the "report" parameter in the box scores. --SkotyWA^T_C 07:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was only one tournament in 2010[edit]

There was only one tournament this year, not two. La Manga did host some additional friendlies, which the New York Red Bulls played in, but they didn't amount to a championship. See this article for details. As such, this page needs to be moved back, and the disambiguation page done away with. oknazevad (talk) 18:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Strangely, The Official La Manga Cup site mentions 2010 La Manga Cups I and II[1], which is what led to this confusion. (Although it is apparent from the schedule that this is not a real cup.) I will see to it that this is sorted out. – Pladask (talk) 20:00, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 La Manga Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]