Talk:2006 National People's Congress

[Untitled][edit]

"Analysts concluded that the report was thorough, detailed, thoughtful, and reached out to the people. It contained less political overtones than previous years. The longest applause came, as expected, during Wen's mention of the firm stance against Taiwan independence." -does this satisfy the objectivity required for a wikipedia page?

You can add more if you want. But from the analysts I watched on TV (Hong Kong and mainland), there seems to be a consensus. But don't miunderstand me. I think most government reports says they are going to achieve great things, but can only fulfill so many promises. Colipon+(T) 23:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Core of Leadership[edit]

whats is the significance of this phrase being left out in relation to hu jintao?

basically, it shows one of two possible things:

Unlike Jiang Zemin's administration, Hu's administration is less focused on the enforced grand image of its leader.
Jiang is still de facto paramount leader, having great enough influence that Hu cannot yet be considered the "core" even though he holds all three highest titles (military, party, state).

Next time, please sign your comment.

Colipon+(T) 23:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification, second paragraph: "In practice, it is rare, but not completely unheard of, for the final vote on legislation to be less than near unianimous, and legislative practice has been to achieve consensus...."

First - "it is rare, but not completely unheard of" is redundant. But it is the phrase "less than near unanimous" that I feel needs clarification. "Less than" can mean up, to and including, nothing. I think you mean "In practice the final vote is often unanimous because legislative practice has been to achieve concensus..." but I am unsure. DurcyleC 19:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking Wikipedia[edit]

Do issues like that come up during the congress? Mithridates 00:21, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not important enough. Besides, only website containing mostly of false info and great animosity direct toward the chinese government are blocked. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.174.36.221 (talk • contribs) .

Actually, anything that the PRC government doesn't like is banned. That includes both sites which tell the truth (eg Wikipedia) and sites which blatantly lie (Falun Gong). -- Миборовский ^{U|T|C|M|E|Chugoku Banzai!} 06:58, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnam[edit]

The Communist Party of Vietnam will also be having a National People's Progress in 2006. I suggest the title be changed to disambiguate. DHN 03:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed item[edit]

In Hu Jintao's administration, the 2006 NPC is more open than previous years.

Not clear to me that this is true.

Roadrunner 17:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See link. Colipon+(T) 07:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/03/05/china.parliament/
- In 2006 National People's Congress on 2011-05-26 02:10:20, 404 Not Found
- In 2006 National People's Congress on 2011-06-14 05:39:05, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]