Talk:2006 Bulgarian presidential election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who did the right parties support[edit]

Some of the right-wing parties were disunited at the time but still chose to support a common candidate, Nedelcho Beronov

Who did they support (if anyone) in the second round? Nil Einne 16:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although Hans-Gert Pöttering advised them to support Parvanov, they didn't officially support anyone. Most of their sympathizers, however, voted for Parvanov. TodorBozhinov 17:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List[edit]

Why is the list organised as it is? Was this the officially numbering on the ballot or whatever? It doesn't appear to be in alphabetical order but perhaps it is in Bulgarian Nil Einne 16:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's the official numbering. It's not in alphabetical order or anything, just a draw. TodorBozhinov 17:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

=> is it somewhere in a web archive ? Or does so. have another reliable source ? --Neun-x (talk) 18:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bulgarian presidential election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]