This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nicaragua, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nicaragua on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NicaraguaWikipedia:WikiProject NicaraguaTemplate:WikiProject NicaraguaNicaragua articles
The latest edits to this article on a pivotal election in a nation that, in 1990, captured a great deal of the world's attention amounts to an apologia for the Sandinista defeat. The truth of the matter is much more complicated. Wikipedia and Nicaragua deserve a much more intellectually honest appraisal. Some examples: polls taken by organizations not connected to the Sandinista regime showed the opposition, not the Sandinistas, winning. Most intimidation, including violent attacks on opposition rallies, came from the Sandinistas, not the U.S. or the opposition. The role of international observation is almost completely absent. If Wikipedia is to be the source of all world knowledge it deserves to be it can't allow blatantly partisan, biased POV articles like this and an increasing number of others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.98.118.115 (talk) 17:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
